Cases 21 - 30 of 94
Parness v. Christie et al
as 2:2015cv03505
Plaintiff:
MARTIN S. PARNESS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J CHRISTIE, Sue Mary Christie, JOHN DOE(s) (1-50) and others
Parness v. Essex County Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2015cv02397
Plaintiff:
MARTIN S. PARNESS
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ALFARO ORTIZ, ROY L HENDRICKS and others
GIBBS v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE et al
as 3:2014cv07138
Plaintiff:
JAMAL GIBBS
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, DONIQUE IVERY, LEEAHH RUSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OJO v. LUONG et al
as 2:2014cv04347
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Defendant:
ANN LUONG, BRIAN ENNESSER, MICHAEL "MIKE" BICKINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONK v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2014cv01399
Plaintiff:
NORWOOD MONK
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY , STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SOUTHERN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOPKINS v. DICRISTI et al
as 1:2013cv05490
Plaintiff:
SHANE HOPKINS
Defendant:
CASSANDRA DICRISTI, JOSEPH BONDISKEY and JOHN DOE(S) 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NADAL v. CHRISTIE et al
as 1:2013cv05447
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE NADAL
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE , GARY M. LANIGAN, JEFFREY S. CHIESA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KALISTA v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY et al
as 1:2013cv04169
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KALISTA
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER COUNTY, CORRECTIONAL SERGEANT ADAMS, CORRECTIONAL SERGEANT CORA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DILLIHAY v. FREED et al
as 1:2013cv01096
Plaintiff:
DARYL I. DILLIHAY
Defendant:
HOWARD E. FREED, HOUCK, P. NEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOPKINS v. BONDISKEY et al
as 1:2012cv05134
Plaintiff:
SHANE HOPKINS
Defendant:
JOSEPH BONDISKEY, SCOTT MEDIO and JOHN DOE(S) 1-15
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
