Cases 21 - 30 of 253
(PC) Lamar v. Sonn, et al.
as 1:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Devin Trevone Lamar, III
Defendant:
Sonn, Toon, T - Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Lamar Hairston v. F. Nagao et al
as 5:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Defendant:
F. Nagao, A. Hernandez, J. Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick L. Hairston v. Kathleen Blanchard et al
as 2:2023cv01338
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Defendant:
Kathleen Blanchard, Edward F. Wiley, Hung Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Lamar Hairston v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00964
Petitioner:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyrone Lamar Barker, Jr. v. Ernest Gollette et al
as 2:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lamar Barker, Jr.
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Ernest Gollette, Correctional Officer A. Madrid, B. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Lamar Hairston v. Unknown
as 5:2022cv02236
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paschall v. Broomfield
as 3:2022cv08518
Petitioner:
Lamar S. Paschall
Respondent:
Warden Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerry Lamar Jenkins, II v. Brian Birkholtz
as 2:2022cv08431
Petitioner:
Jerry Lamar Jenkins, II
Respondent:
Brian Birkholtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Wilburn v. Alison
as 1:2022cv01375
Petitioner:
Terrence Lamar Wilburn
Respondent:
Kathleen Alison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Wilburn v. Alison
as 2:2022cv01947
Petitioner:
Terrence Lamar Wilburn
Respondent:
Kathleen Alison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
