Cases 21 - 30 of 2,665
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00994
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Rodriguez Morales v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv03761
Petitioner:
Juan Eduardo Rodriguez Morales
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodwin v. Gomez et al
as 3:2024cv06645
Defendant:
P. Morales, L Maciel, Sergeant J. Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Glen Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Wilson v. Morales et al
as 1:2024cv01113
Defendant:
Bryan D. Phillips, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, M. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernandez Morales v. Hartman et al
as 3:2024cv00418
Defendant:
Henly, Robert Hartman, Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Yoandy Fernandez Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv03493
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Joshua Jonathan Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samuel Zamudio Jimenez v. Raul Morales
as 2:2024cv07888
Respondent:
Raul Morales
Petitioner:
Samuel Zamudio Jiminez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fernandez Morales v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00407
Defendant:
Nethanjah Breitenbach, Flamm, Rushing and others
Plaintiff:
Yoandy Fernandez Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez-Morales v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv01232
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Plaintiff:
Ramon Sanchez-Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
