Cases 21 - 30 of 105
OWENS et al v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01613
Plaintiff:
DAVID OWENS, DAVID HOWARD, MICHAEL WILSON and others
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Renfro, III v. Warden
as 5:2022cv00725
Petitioner:
Donald Renfro, III
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Renfro v. People Of The State Of KY et al
as 3:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Phillip W. Renfro
Defendant:
People Of The State Of KY, Cookie Crews, Todd D. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Renfro v. People of the State of Kentucky
as 3:2022cv00230
Petitioner:
Phillip W. Renfro
Respondent:
People of the State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Renfro v. Robey
as 3:2022cv00190
Petitioner:
Phillip W. Renfro
Defendant:
Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Warner v. Godfrey et al
as 6:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner
Defendant:
Demetric Godfrey, Jim Salmonsen, Lynn Guyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Renfro v. West Valley Detention Center et al
as 5:2021cv01414
Plaintiff:
Donald Renfro, III
Defendant:
West Valley Detention Center, Classification Staff, Custody Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renfro v. Baker et al
as 4:2021cv02172
Defendant:
Bruce Fredricks, Dale Wainwright, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Plaintiff:
Rashard Esaw Renfro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Budney v. Honeycutt, et al
as 1:2021cv00062
Defendant:
FNU Ellis, FNU Wilson, FNU Hartzog and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Budney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renfro v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2021cv00049
Defendant:
James M. Cooper, Jonathan S. Joseph, Onyemuche E. Ogu and others
Plaintiff:
Rashard Esaw Renfro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
