Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Westerfield v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00970
Petitioner:
Eric R. Westerfield
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shane Begley v. Denver Tyree, et al
as 17-5001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANE JEFFERSON BEGLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DENVER TYREE, RODNEY GAY, JAMIE MOSLEY and others
Cleo Westerfield v. Gomez et al
as 2:2016cv05957
Defendant:
C O Gomez, C O Gomez, C O Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Cleo Westerfield
WESTERFIELD v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv00634
Petitioner:
RONNY WESTERFIELD
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WESTERFIELD v. COUNTY OF FAYETTE, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2014cv01697
Plaintiff:
RONNY J. WESTERFIELD
Defendant:
COUNTY OF FAYETTE, PENNSYLVANIA, NANCY D. VERNON, JACK R. HENEKS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Westerfield v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2014cv02012
Petitioner:
Eric Westerfield
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Westerfield
as 1:2014cv02583
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lorie Westerfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Westerfield v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2013cv01206
Petitioner:
Kurt Westerfield
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Calvin Westerfield v. Lloyd Rapelje
as 13-2272
Petitioner - Appellant:
CALVIN WESTERFIELD
Respondent - Appellee:
LLOYD RAPELJE
Salyers et al v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Michael Salyers and Cathy Salyers
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Laurel County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
