Cases 31 - 40 of 451
Harris v. Hochel et al
as 1:2023cv06420
Plaintiff:
Baron Charles Harris
Defendant:
Governor Katherine Hochel, Sean Dixon, Isabel Velasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gojcaj v. Naqvi et al
as 3:2023cv01097
Plaintiff:
Marash Gojcaj
Defendant:
Syed Naqvi, Umprakash Pillai, Francesco Lupis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gagne et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Gerard G. Gagne, Daniel Yesu, Michelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. Barone et al
as 3:2023cv00967
Plaintiff:
John Burgess
Defendant:
Barone, Lupis, Tawana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M BARON
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Forester, Esq. et al
as 1:2023cv04614
Plaintiff:
Damecha Harris
Defendant:
Jean Ellen Forester, Esq., Patricia G. Rivia Stokner, Kristen Mantell, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waters v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
Thomas Waters
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP-Pollock, USP-Florence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lyons v. Harnett County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023ct03174
Plaintiff:
Baron Lyons
Defendant:
Harnett County Detention Center and Nurse Beverly Autry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLaurin v. Kabat et al
as 2:2023cv11212
Plaintiff:
Michael Marcel McLaurin
Defendant:
Kabat, Dalton, Salinas and others
Lawry v. Barone
as 2:2023cv03625
Plaintiff:
Trevor Lawry
Defendant:
John Doe and Deputy Warden Vincenzo Barone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
