Cases 31 - 40 of 1,929
Potter v. McKenzie et al
as 0:2024cv00065
Defendant:
Shawn McKenzie and Cookie Crews
Plaintiff:
James Carr Potter, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick Kurkowski, et al v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2086
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DALBERG, PATRICK KURKOWSKI, JAYVON FLEMMING and others
Defendant:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL HEPP, JARED HOY and others
Potter v. McKenzie et al
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
James Carr Potter, II
Defendant:
Warden Shawn McKenzie and Commissioner Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordova, Anthony v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordova
Defendant:
Randall Hepp, Kevin A. Carr and Sarah Cooper
Unknown:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winthrop v. Pasco County Jail et al
as 8:2024cv01472
Defendant:
Sergeant Carr and Pasco County Jail
Plaintiff:
Dezhun Winthrop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olumakinde v. Carr et al
as 1:2024cv01794
Plaintiff:
Fashanu Irewolf Olumakinde
Defendant:
Officer Carr and Baltimore County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Carr v. Cueva et al
as 2:2024cv01680
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cueva and Cody Dail
Plaintiff:
Paul David Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Wilkerson et al
as 2:2024cv11508
Defendant:
Ngamu, Nwoko and Na Ouisha Wilkerson
Plaintiff:
Thomas Carl Carr
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
WOULLARD v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Defendant:
B GUILBIT, CELLERI, BARNES and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Keith Carr
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
