Cases 31 - 40 of 58
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. BIDEN et al
as 2:2020cv01968
Defendant:
BLACK LIVES MATTER ORGANIZATION, UNKNOWN NAMED GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOE BIDEN and others
Plaintiff:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. SWANN et al
as 3:2020cv02378
Defendant:
Phippe, Hope L. Swann, Judge Krause and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Michael S Owlfeather-Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2020cv03660
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. SWANN et al
as 1:2020cv02979
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, HOPE L. SWANN, TIFFANY L. LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2020cv02793
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv02398
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv02399
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv01868
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
ANGELA D. CAESAR and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 3:2020cv01150
Petitioner:
Chief Michael S Owlfeather-Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv01572
Respondent:
ANGELA D. CAESAR, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
