Cases 31 - 40 of 3,482
Curley v. Nixon et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Defendant:
Stephanie McKinney, Nathan Jhonson, Tanedda Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Curley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Graziano v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2249
Defendant:
RICHARD CAMACHO, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, C/O DALE BARGER and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD GRAZIANO
Winchell v. Green et al
as 0:2024cv00070
Defendant:
Julian Rye, Tracy Keeton, William Caudill and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Winchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nava Ortiz v. McCullough et al
as 3:2024cv01799
Defendant:
Nathan Pettey and Thomas McCullough
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Nava Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yant #237696 v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv00702
Defendant:
Rosemary Villasan, R. Coleman, Heidi E. Washington and others
Plaintiff:
James N. Yant #237696
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peachey v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02483
Petitioner:
Nathan Peachey
Respondent:
Warden C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nathan Nissenbaum v. Chad Jennings
as 24-2162
Plaintiff:
NATHAN NISSENBAUM
Respondent:
CHAD JENNINGS
WATKINS v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI BENNER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2024cv00976
Petitioner:
NATHAN GENE WATKINS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CLARION COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT SCI BENNER TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Almonte v. O' Hagan Wolfe et al
as 1:2024cv04649
Defendant:
Garard E. Lynch, Sarah A.L. Merriam, Alison J Nathan and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Almonte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peachey v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv04116
Plaintiff:
Nathan Peachey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
