Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Mays v. Sherburne County Jail et al
as 0:2020cv00506
Defendant:
Travis Lundstrom, Bryan Bjergo, Tyrel Hoppe and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reese v. Sherburne County Detention Center et al
as 0:2019cv01975
Defendant:
MEND Medical Services Inc., Jane Doe, Sherburne County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Dontay Lavarice Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Hussain et al
as 0:2019cv01559
Defendant:
Mend Correctional Care, Patrick Carr, Joel Blott and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ramsey County Jail et al
as 0:2019cv01227
Defendant:
Ramsey County Jail and Sherburne County Jail
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Deven Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Sherburne County Jail et al
as 0:2017cv04604
Plaintiff:
Sean Washington
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail, Janell Mehlhoff, Diana Vanderbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldmann v. Mehlhoff et al
as 0:2017cv04151
Plaintiff:
Steven Jacob Goldmann
Defendant:
Janell Mehlhoff, Diana VanDerBeek, Brian Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. MEND Medical Services et al
as 0:2016cv04015
Plaintiff:
Trinidad Jesus Garcia
Defendant:
MEND Medical Services, Gwen Blossom, Michelle Skroch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Kachamarek et al
as 0:2015cv03531
Plaintiff:
Anthony Curtis Harris
Defendant:
Lisa Kachamarek, Sherburne County Jail and Jami Neyssen
Mehralian v. Commissioner of Corrections, Sherburne County Jail
as 0:2015cv01877
Petitioner:
Ali Mehralian
Defendant:
Commissioner of Corrections, Sherburne County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Haggins v. Sherburne County et al
as 0:2010cv02554
Plaintiff:
Dejuan Haywood Haggins
Defendant:
Sherburne County, Sherburne County Sheriff, Stephen Pedersen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
