Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Finch v. Davidson County Sheriff's Dept
as 2:2020cv02030
Petitioner:
Nathan Finch
Respondent:
Davidson County Sheriff's Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Finch v. Davidson County Sheriff Dept.
as 3:2020cv00033
Petitioner:
Nathan Finch
Respondent:
Davidson County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gay v. Weatherford et al
as 3:2019cv01149
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Gay
Defendant:
Mr. Sonny Weatherford, Warrant Officer and Sumner County Sheriffs Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sabo v. Greene Co Sheriff's Dept et al
as 2:2019cv00199
Defendant:
Greene Co Sheriff's Dept and Franklyn Morgan
Plaintiff:
Steven Sabo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKee v. Loudon County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2019cv00450
Plaintiff:
Joseph B McKee
Defendant:
Loudon County Jail, Loudon County Sheriff's Office, Unnamed Loudon County Sheriff's Dept in Charge of Operations Training and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seiber v. Anderson County Tenn. et al
as 3:2019cv00424
Defendant:
Anderson County Tenn., Anderson County Sheriff Dept., Southern Health Partners and others
Plaintiff:
Joey Douglas Seiber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Knox County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 3:2019cv00397
Defendant:
Knox County Sheriffs Dept and Roger D Wilson Detention Facility
Plaintiff:
George Kenneth Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gooden v. Sheriff's Dept. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2019cv00709
Defendant:
Amy Anderson, Fox News Corp., Bill Shacklett and others
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Gooden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Wellpath Medical et al
as 3:2019cv00675
Defendant:
Does 1-5, Tony Wickes, Wellpath Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Satterfield v. TN Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00254
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pringle Satterfield
Defendant:
Loudon County Sheriff's Dept, Loudon County Jail and TN Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
