Cases 31 - 40 of 235
Baker v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00515
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico State Parole Board
Plaintiff:
Matthew Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeHerrera et al v. GCCF
as 1:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Jarell Robinson, Edwardo Jesus Casillas, Mario Recio and others
Defendant:
FNU Jacobo, Alisha Tafoya, GCCF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Robert Ferguson
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and FNU Wilkens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sosa v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Johnny A. Sosa
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldomor v. Wilkins et al
as 2:2024cv00499
Defendant:
FNU Wilkins, GCCF and Alisha Tafoya
Plaintiff:
Christopher Baldomor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00500
Defendant:
Warden Wilkens, Alisha Tafoya, Governor of New Mexico and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trujillo v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Michelle Lujan Grisham, Jacob D. and others
Plaintiff:
Fabian Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olivas et al v. Wilkans et al
as 1:2024cv00502
Defendant:
I Jocobo, New Mexico State Parole Board, Alisha Tafoya and others
Plaintiff:
Obed Olivas, Craig Reimer, Daniel Strew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wopschall v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00503
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya, FNU Wilkens and Jacob O.
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wopschall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoyt v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoyt
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Michelle Lujan Grisham, Jacob D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
