Cases 31 - 40 of 141
Torres v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2021cv01587
Plaintiff:
Taylor Torres
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2021cv01541
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Jimenez, Jesus Joel Vargas, Juan Manuel Flores, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grigsby v. Howard et al
as 4:2021cv00266
Petitioner:
Philip Andra Grigsby
Respondent:
Catricia Howard, A Torres, G Merrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Uselton v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02141
Defendant:
David Shinn, Centurian Managed Care, E Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
John Stevenson Uselton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres #297805 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv01802
Petitioner:
Jacob Anthony Torres
Respondent:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cushman v. Griego et al
as 2:2020cv01592
Defendant:
Susan Murray, Unknown Picazzo, Unknown Susunkwa and others
Plaintiff:
James W Cushman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs #280904 v. Torres et al
as 2:2020cv01130
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Combs
Defendant:
Unknown Torres and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rich v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2020cv00573
Defendant:
Unknown Lopez, Charles L Ryan, Arizona, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Valenzuela v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05902
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Petitioner:
Catarino Torres Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lynn #178201 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv05759
Defendant:
Unknown Piller, Unknown Ware, Unknown Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Asia Lynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
