Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Austin v. Kennelly et al
as 1:2010cv06602
Petitioner:
Arturio Semone Austin
Respondent:
Matthew F. Kennelly and Ronald L. Dewald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Scott v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2010cv01840
Plaintiff:
Gerald Scott
Defendant:
David J Ebbert, Hunter, DeWald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2010cv06140
Plaintiff:
Gerald Scott
Defendant:
David J. Ebbert, Hunter, Dewald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dewayne Richardson v. USA, et al
as 10-3034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEWAYNE RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FED BUREAU OF PRISONS, US ATTY GEN and others
McCall et al v. Martinez et al
as 3:2010cv01121
Plaintiff:
Bondary McCall, Vaughn Mark Curtis, Willie Brown and others
Defendant:
NFN Martinez, David Ebbert, NFN Dewald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richard Blanchard v. J. Bennett, et al
as 10-2423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD L. BLANCHARD
Defendant - Appellee:
J. BENNETT, K. DEWALD, VERMEIRE, Dr. and others
Richardson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2010cv01009
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Richardson
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Eric H. Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. DEWALD et al
as 2:2010cv01205
Plaintiff:
AARON BOYD
Defendant:
DANIEL DEWALD, VICTOR MARIN, GUY MARIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Ebbert et al
as 4:2009cv02334
Petitioner:
Elijah Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert, Julie Nickline, R. Marques and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WILLIAMS v. DEWALD #017 et al
as 2:2009cv02437
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DANIEL DEWALD #017, JOHN D'ONOFFIO #017 and ROBERT TIERNEY #021
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
