Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Patterson v. Norton et al
as 5:2013ct03132
Plaintiff:
Maechel Shawn Patterson
Defendant:
Mitchell D Norton, Maynard Harrell, Alan Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galeas Jr. v. Harrell et al
as 5:2013ct03093
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas Jr.
Defendant:
Joseph Harrell, Felix C. Taylor and North Carolina Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Jones et al
as 5:2013ct03059
Plaintiff:
Dwight White
Defendant:
Robert G. Jones, Joseph Harrell, Nurse Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baity v. Daniels et al
as 5:2013ct03039
Plaintiff:
Aaron W. Baity
Defendant:
Dennis Daniels, John Herring, Gail Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mendoza-Hapa v. Taylor et al
as 5:2013ct03031
Plaintiff:
Salomon Valerio Mendoza-Hapa
Defendant:
Felix C. Taylor, Joseph Harrell, Captain Blane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Taborn et al
as 5:2012ct03251
Plaintiff:
Herbert Francis Young
Defendant:
Nicole Taborn, Ronnell Prioleau, Tracy W. Johns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Holder et al
as 5:2012ct03245
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Smith
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Jonathan C. Miner, Brick Tripp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SWITZER v. BAKER-HARRELL et al
as 1:2012cv01272
Plaintiff:
ROBBIE LEE SWITZER
Defendant:
WOODRENA BAKER-HARRELL and HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivins action
Knight v. Smith et al
as 3:2012de00666
Plaintiff:
Wendell Knight
Defendant:
Lewis Smith, Robert G. Jones, Felix C. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
STEPHENS v. ANDREWS et al
as 1:2012cv00233
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS O. STEPHENS
Defendant:
MIKE ANDREWS, PATRICIA BUTLER and SAMPSON HARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
