Cases 41 - 50 of 7,226
Yung v. Rikers Island Prison Warden of OBCC et al
as 1:2024cv05747
Defendant:
Rikers Island Prison Warden of OBCC and Sgt. Adams
Plaintiff:
John Yung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Murray v. Doe et al
as 7:2024cv05849
Defendant:
Warden, Hanes, Officer John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel S. Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Moores et al
as 1:2024cv05844
Plaintiff:
Shy-Tique Kelly
Defendant:
Dr. Bentivenga, Carol A. Moores, C.O. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Tonkery et al
as 6:2024cv06457
Defendant:
Joseph Earner, Bradley Tonkery, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perkins v. Bowers et al
as 7:2024cv05558
Defendant:
Ryan Bowers, James Goodson and John and Jane Doe 1-10
Plaintiff:
Nayshawn Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Delaney v. Pennel et al
as 1:2024cv05676
Defendant:
Laborers International Union of North America, LIUNA 477, George Alarm, Laidlaw Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis W. Delaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Warden RMSC Doe et al
as 1:2024cv05711
Plaintiff:
Marcus C. Wright
Defendant:
Warden RMSC John Doe and Grievance Supervisor Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mejia v. Ruquet et al
as 7:2024cv05603
Defendant:
Lt. John Doe 1, CO Mays, Sgt. John Doe 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Dionis Mejia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moalawi v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv05795
Plaintiff:
Ali Moalawi
Defendant:
Detective Steven Stanley, The City of New York, Detective Albert Velez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Klein v. Norton et al
as 1:2024cv05636
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Amy Schell, Wellpath and others
Plaintiff:
Christian P. E. Klein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
