Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 57
James McKines v. Joseph Norwood
as 09-55804
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES ALBERT MCKINES, AKA James A. McKines
Respondent - Appellee: JOSEPH NORWOOD, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00734
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Lewis v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center et al
as 5:2009cv00173
Plaintiff: James Albert Lewis
Defendant: Bexar County Adult Detention Center, Bexar County Sheriff's Office, FNU Oyervides and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lewis v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center et al
as 4:2009cv00173
Plaintiff: James Albert Lewis
Defendant: Bexar County Adult Detention Center, Bexar County Sheriff's Office, FNU Oyervides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grosse v. Davis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00157
Petitioner: James Albert Grosse
Respondent: Belinda Davis
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reigle v. USA-2255 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv02512
Petitioner: James Albert Reigle, Jr.
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Swoopes v. Baker
as 5:2008cv01406
Plaintiff: James Albert Swoopes
Defendant: James Baker and Matt
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James McKines v. J. Norwood
as 08-56253
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES ALBERT MCKINES
Respondent - Appellee: J. L. NORWOOD
James Albert McKines v. J. L. Norwood We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv04993
Petitioner: James Albert McKines
Respondent: J. L. Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. USA
as 8:2008cv70070
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: James Albert Jones
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?