Cases 51 - 60 of 376
Smith v. Houser
as 4:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Stanely E. Smith
Respondent:
Earl L. Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bell v. Ardery et al
as 1:2022cv02003
Plaintiff:
Carl Edward Bell
Defendant:
Kim Ardery, Morris Houser, George Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cribbs v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv01950
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Elizabeth Cribbs
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, George Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYES et al v. HOUSER et al
as 4:2022cv01939
Plaintiff:
MS. S. Hayes and Joel Marrero
Defendant:
Morris Houser, Captain Kauffman, Major of the Guard Bradley Booher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REAL v. HOUSER, et al.
as 2:2022cv04812
Petitioner:
FERNANDO REAL
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER, HOUSER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHIL. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: HOUSER
as 2:2022cv04862
Plaintiff:
DARIEN HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAGAN v. HOUSER et al
as 2:2022cv04751
Petitioner:
JUAN PAGAN
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DRAYTON v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2022cv01606
Plaintiff:
FRANKLYN DRAYTON
Defendant:
D. EDWARDS, MS. CAMPOPIANO, MS. A. SHOWALTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee-Chima v. Carolan et al
as 3:2022cv01801
Plaintiff:
Kasheyon Lee-Chima
Defendant:
E.C. Carolan, Carmac, John Doe # 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00245
Petitioner:
Tyrone Hampton
Respondent:
Earl L. Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
