Cases 51 - 60 of 206
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 4:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
Alan Samuel Mansell
Defendant:
Safety and Risk Analysis Consulting, Mark Anthony Mansell and Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansell v. United Energy Healthcare Workers et al
as 4:2017cv05047
Plaintiff:
Alan Samuel Mansell
Defendant:
United Energy Healthcare Workers, Chad Shumway, City of Prosser Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansell v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2017cv05046
Plaintiff:
Alan Samuel Mansell
Defendant:
Emily K Sullivan, Benton County Prosecutors Office and Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansell v. State of Oregon et al
as 4:2017cv05038
Plaintiff:
Alan Samuel Mansell
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Transportation, Oregon Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansell v. Benton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2017cv05037
Plaintiff:
Alan Samuel Mansell
Defendant:
Dept Chief, Keene, Hatcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansell v. City of Walla Walla Washington et al
as 4:2017cv05039
Plaintiff:
Alan Samuel Mansell
Defendant:
City of Walla Walla Washington, Mayor, Walla Walla Chamber of Commerce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2016cv05125
Plaintiff:
Donald R Hunt
Defendant:
David Bailey , Che , Jacqueline L Fluaitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv00323
Plaintiff:
Donald R Hunt
Defendant:
David Bailey , Che , Jacqueline L Fluaitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Prat et al
as 2:2016cv00862
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M Martin
Defendant:
Christene Prat, Sheryl Pendergrass, Laura Nightryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bergeron v. Trizuto
as 2:2016cv00358
Petitioner:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Respondent:
M Trizuto, J Holmes, J Rood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
