Cases 71 - 80 of 3,578
Smith et al v. Dennis et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Karen Pointer and Lamar R. Smith
Defendant:
Jeb Dennis, Brandi Duvall, William Begley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. Warden, Brevard County Jail
as 6:2024cv01082
Petitioner:
Harold Lamar Cummings, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Brevard County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. JONES et al
as 5:2024cv00119
Defendant:
WILLIE R CORFT and DANIELLE K JONES
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Lamar et al
as 3:2024cv00590
Defendant:
Dorothy Sedgwick, Lawson Lamar, Michael E. Martenko and others
Plaintiff:
Paris Demetrius Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Anekwe
as 5:2024cv00640
Defendant:
Senior Chaplin Paul Anekwe
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lamar Smith
Amicus Curiae:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon #158463 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 1:2024cv00610
Defendant:
Unknown Becher, Unknown Fleicher, Michigan Parole Board and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Lamar Dixon #158463
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv02514
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKenstry v. Gamble et al
as 1:2024cv01636
Defendant:
Robert S. Dean, Jr., Melvin Norman, Raphael Gamble and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar T. McKenstry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson Smith v. Ted Jackson, et al
as 24-11826
Plaintiff:
STEPHENSON LAMAR SMITH
Defendant:
TED JACKSON, OFFICER JONES and OFFICER WILLIAMS
Derrick Lamar Hairston v. Warden
as 2:2024cv04855
Petitioner:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
