Cases 81 - 89 of 89
Kelly v. Feleciano et al
as 5:2007cv03274
Plaintiff:
Altus Ray Kelly
Defendant:
Paul Feleciano, Roger Werholtz, Cherryl Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2007cv03244
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Charles E. Simmons, Bill Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burch et al v. Jordan et al
as 5:2007cv03236
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Burch, Bryan L Williamson, Floyd Mondragon and others
Defendant:
Don Jordan, Mark E Schutter, Austin T DesLauriers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Terrell et al
as 5:2007cv03226
Plaintiff:
Eric Derasse Walker
Defendant:
Duke Terrell, Michael Nalley, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Miller v. Jordan et al
as 5:2007cv03221
Plaintiff:
Richard A Miller
Defendant:
Don Jordan, Mark Schutter, Phill Ledford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2007cv03165
Plaintiff:
Joe Dawson
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, Sam Cline, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmisten v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2007cv03116
Plaintiff:
Jonathan J Edmisten
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, David R. McKune, Ray Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2007cv03101
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee McCall
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Roger Werholtz, Louis E Bruce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Donley et al
as 5:2007cv03066
Plaintiff:
McKinley Ross
Defendant:
Cherry Donley, Jordan Baxter, J Ponds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
