Cases 1 - 10 of 158
Allen v. Windom et al (INMATE 3)
as 7:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Samuel Calvin Allen
Defendant:
Gretchen Rooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00813
Defendant:
Paul C Johnson, Roderick Gadsen and Derrick Dent
Plaintiff:
Samuel J Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Windom et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00296
Defendant:
Mary B. Windom, Officer Menclheim, Officer Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Calvin Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miles v. Donaldson Correctional Facility
as 2:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Samuel H Miles, Jr
Defendant:
Donaldson Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Smith et al
as 7:2022cv00991
Plaintiff:
Samuel Leon Jones
Defendant:
Nick Smith, Richard Calloway and Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. State of Alabama et al
as 7:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
Donell Curry
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Reform Alabama City Police Department, Pickens County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Alabama, State of et al
as 7:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Paris Wells
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Samuel W Junkins, Pickens County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Smoak et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2021cv00736
Plaintiff:
Samuel D. Lewis
Defendant:
Jason Smoak, Mark Trawick, Spencer Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bateman v. Cone et al
as 2:2021cv01285
Plaintiff:
Nathan Parke Bateman
Defendant:
Matt Cone, Wayne Knight, Samuel Ebeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Danzey et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
Vantwain L. Stokes
Defendant:
Spencer W. Danzey, Will Maddox, Troy Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
