Cases 1 - 10 of 154
Martin v. Gilley et al
as 6:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Adam Eugene Martin
Defendant:
Baker, Baker, Asher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Day v. Laurel County Correctional Center et al
as 6:2024cv00108
Defendant:
Jamie Mosley, Gary Martin and Laurel County Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Paul Gordon Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Gilley
as 6:2024cv00100
Respondent:
Warden Gilley
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thurman v. Crews et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Defendant:
Brianna Capel, Stacy Gibson, Cookie Crews and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Thurman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Warden USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00090
Respondent:
Warden USP McCreary
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Warden USP McCreary
as 3:2024cv00315
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Respondent:
Warden USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. Plappert et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Henry Price, III
Defendant:
Laura Plappert, Cookie Crews, Courtney Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Call et al
as 3:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Donald Lynn Martin
Respondent:
Matt Call and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Martin
as 1:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Gary Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Warden at FMC Lexington et al
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
Warden at FMC Lexington and C.O. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
