Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CURRY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv00957
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD CURRY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ROBERT JUNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS V. SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL.
as 1:2014cv00873
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD THOMAS
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JON OZMINT, MEDICAL DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2014cv00842
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD THOMAS
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JON OZMINT and PRISON DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. WAINWRIGHT
as 1:2011cv02205
Petitioner:
CHARLES EDWARD JONES, JR.
Respondent:
SIMON T. WAINWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES, JR. v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2011cv01727
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD JONES, JR.
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, US PAROLE COMMISSION, GARY WHEELER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2011cv01260
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD JONES, JR.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DUKE TERRELL, M. FACEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2011cv00573
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD JONES, JR.
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE COMMISSION, U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. WAINWRIGHT
as 1:2010cv01186
Petitioner:
CHARLES EDWARD JONES, JR.
Respondent:
SIMON T. WAINWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES v. US PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2010cv00359
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD JONES, JR.
Defendant:
US PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
