Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Grizzle v. The State of Texas et al
as 5:2024cv00180
Defendant:
FNU LNU 5:24-CV-180-H-1, Brenda G. Gardnes, Clayton J. Arrendall and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024xc00037
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lucas v. Straughan et al
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Alan Lucas
Defendant:
Clayton Straughan and Sue Gamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Clayton Bob Bryan
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clayton v. Deputy Hopkin
as 4:2023cv04753
Plaintiff:
Almer Clayton
Defendant:
Deputy Hopkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deleon v. Vasquez et al
as 5:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Rocky Deleon
Defendant:
Krista Vasquez, Clayton J. Arendall, Charles B. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brothers v. Harris County et al
as 4:2023cv03379
Petitioner:
Clayton Tuttle Brothers
Respondent:
Harris County, Judge Robert Johnson and Harris County CSCD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Pederson et al
as 5:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quin Butler
Defendant:
H.M. Pederson, Ronald S. Ivey, FNU Whitfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Warden of FCI Bastrop
as 5:2023cv00571
Petitioner:
Clayton Hall
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Bastrop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green v. Higgins Jr. et al.
as 5:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
Clayton R. Higgins Jr. et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.