Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Cruz-Rivera v. US
as 23-1984
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARLOS CRUZ-RIVERA
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Rivera Diaz et al v. Peterson et al
as 2:2023cv01310
Plaintiff:
Timothy Reedy, Sylvester Thomas, Antonio Brooks and others
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, Denita R Ball, Cpt William Dokert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez-Rivera v. Garza et al
as 4:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Carlos Sanchez-Rivera
Defendant:
Warden Garza, Counselor Betos, Case Manager Roundtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUZ-RIVERA v. USA
as 1:2022cv01936
Petitioner:
ROBERTO CARLOS CRUZ RIVERA
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rivera v. Gutierrez
as 4:2022cv00318
Petitioner:
Carlos Francisco Rivera
Respondent:
Unknown Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rivera v. USA
as 3:2022cv00576
Petitioner:
Carlos F. Rivera
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rivera v. Garman et al
as 5:2020cv02717
Petitioner:
CARLOS M. RIVERA
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and Superintendent Garman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera v. Garman et al
as 3:2020cv00857
Petitioner:
Carlos M. Rivera
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Superintendent Garman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RIVERA MAYSONET v. FERGUSON et al
as 5:2018cv02260
Petitioner:
CARLOS J. RIVERA MAYSONET
Respondent:
TAMMY S. FERGUSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. RIVERA
as 5:2015cv05263
Petitioner:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent:
CARLOS MANUEL RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
