Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Gibson v. Click
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Gibson, Jr.
Respondent:
Terry County Sheriff and Timothy Click
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Terry County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Gibson, Jr.
Defendant:
Terry County Jail and TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Ryan et al
as 3:2019cv08032
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Charles W Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gibson v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv04903
Plaintiff:
Charles C Gibson
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. 132nd Judicial District of Scurry County Texas
as 5:2017cv00154
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Gibson, Jr
Defendant:
132nd Judicial District of Scurry County Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. OWENS
as 1:2017cv02281
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. GIBSON
Defendant:
DAVID OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Insitutional Division et al
as 5:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Gibson, Jr
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Insitutional Division and Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. WALKER et al
as 1:2016cv06861
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. GIBSON
Defendant:
CHARLES WALKER, SCOTT, DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Gibson, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-11405
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES RAY GIBSON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Gibson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2016cv00194
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Gibson, Jr
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
