Cases 1 - 10 of 65
(PC) Quintero v. Lemon et al
as 2:2023cv01719
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez Quintero
Defendant:
Tristan Lemon and Oxborrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Quintero v. Mike et al
as 2:2023cv01720
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez Quintero
Defendant:
T. Mike and Tristan Lemon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Quintero v. Lemon et al
as 1:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez Quintero
Defendant:
Tristan Lemon and Oxborrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rodriguez Quintero v. Lemon
as 2:2023cv01633
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez Quintero
Defendant:
Tristan Lemon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rodriguez Quintero v. Lemon
as 1:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez Quintero
Defendant:
Tristan Lemon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Rodriguez v. Warden Janson
as 23-6702
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANNY ANGEL RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Daniel Rodriguez
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FCI EDGEFIELD
Rodriguez v. Janson FCI Edgefield
as 1:2023cv01893
Petitioner:
Daniel Angel Rodriguez and Daniel Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Janson FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Peters v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2023cv00750
Plaintiff:
Scott Peters
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Daniel Rodriguez, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. John H. Stroger Hospital (Cook County Hospital) et al
as 1:2022cv05881
Plaintiff:
Jose Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant:
John H. Stroger Hospital (Cook County Hospital)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Quintero v. Warden Tristan
as 3:2022cv01625
Petitioner:
Daniel Rodriguez Quintero
Respondent:
Warden Tristan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
