Cases 1 - 10 of 26
RABY v. REAVES-PHAMS et al
as 5:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
JODY LEE RABY
Defendant:
ANGELA REAVES-PHAMS, MICHAEL MCCRAE and MR WEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sencial v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2023cv03351
Plaintiff:
Steven Jay Sencial
Defendant:
Joseph Lopinto, III, Correct Health Jefferson LLC, Jody Lee Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PULLIAM v. USA
as 1:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
JODY LEE PULLIAM, JR.
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomason v. Oliver et al
as 1:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jody Lee Thomason
Defendant:
Warden Oliver, Deputy Warden Houston and Captain Stallworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ambrose v. Jefferson Parish Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv02791
Plaintiff:
Telly Savlaes Ambrose
Defendant:
Jefferson Parish Detention Center, Joseph P. Lopinto, III, Yakaba Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEELE v. MOORE et al
as 1:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
JODIE LEE STEELE, II
Defendant:
SRG SARGENT MOORE and SRG OFFICER SWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEELE v. HARTNESS
as 1:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
JODIE LEE STEELE, II
Defendant:
JOHN D. HARTNESS, J. MATHE-LY and J. RORRER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2021cv00433
Petitioner:
Jody Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Doe et al
as 1:2020cv01751
Defendant:
Nurse Fearoun, Dr. Jingle, Nurse John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jodie Lee Brown, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARDENAS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2019cv03408
Defendant:
JODY LEE, ANGEL CASTRO, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO CESAR CARDENAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
