Cases 1 - 10 of 3,482
Beal v. State of Washington
as 2:2024cv00324
Respondent:
State of Washington
Petitioner:
Nathan O Beal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chase v. Warden Emig et al
as 1:2024cv01052
Defendant:
Katrina Burley, Staff Lt. Nathan Atherholt, DOC Commissioner T. Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Chase
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01613
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardison v. Carmicheal et al
as 3:2024cv00415
Petitioner:
Casey William Hardison
Respondent:
Pershing County Jail Nevada and Nathan Carmicheal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stiltner v. Kilgore
as 7:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Stiltner
Defendant:
Major Nathan George Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lomax v. Faulkner et al
as 2:2024cv01702
Petitioner:
Nathan L. Lomax
Respondent:
Bob Faulkner and William Hutchins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curley v. Nixon et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Defendant:
Stephanie McKinney, Nathan Jhonson, Tanedda Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Curley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leuthold v. Wills
as 1:2024cv01323
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Petitioner:
Nathan A Leuthold
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frye v. Wilson et al
as 3:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Devon Frye
Defendant:
Jason Wilson, Nathan Moore and Santa Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Kilgore
as 7:2024cv00620
Defendant:
Major Nathan George Kilgore
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Carroll, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
