Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Winchell v. Green et al
as 0:2024cv00070
Defendant:
Julian Rye, Tracy Keeton, William Caudill and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Winchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roth v. Metcalfe County Sheriff Office
as 1:2024cv00076
Defendant:
Metcalfe County Sheriff Office
Plaintiff:
Nathan Donald Roth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Crews et al
as 0:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Scott Patrick Kennedy
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, David Green, Lt. Nathan Elam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Jones et al
as 0:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Brandon Jones, Nathan Conley and Wesley Coldiron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Brandon Jones, Nathan Conley and Wesley Coldiron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morel v. Pearce et al
as 7:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Lenin Morel
Defendant:
Kevin Pearce, James Adams, Nathan Tussey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Green et al
as 0:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Adams
Defendant:
Warden James David Green, Captain John Doe, Dustin Henderson (Lt) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hineson v. Wade et al
as 3:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Wendy Hineson
Defendant:
Nathan Wade, Kelsie Torres and Amanda Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hineson v. Wade et al
as 3:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Wendy Hineson
Defendant:
Nathan Wade, Kelsie Torres and Amanda Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Franklin County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anthony W. Austin
Defendant:
Franklin County, Kentucky, Chris Quire, Nathan M. Doty and others
Debtor:
John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
