Cases 1 - 10 of 254
Orosco v. Brown et al
as 5:2024cv00929
Respondent:
Nathan Brown and Rolando Arguelles
Petitioner:
Andrew Orosco, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Orosco v. Brown et al
as 5:2024cv00926
Defendant:
Nathan Brown and Rolando Arguelles
Plaintiff:
Andrew Orosco, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curley v. Nixon et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Defendant:
Stephanie McKinney, Nathan Jhonson, Tanedda Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Curley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nava Ortiz v. McCullough et al
as 3:2024cv01799
Defendant:
Nathan Pettey and Thomas McCullough
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Nava Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mozee v. Chandler et al
as 5:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'Neal Mozee
Defendant:
Jennifer Hamilton and Nathan Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hillman v. Hillman et al
as 9:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Danny A. Hillman
Defendant:
Michelle Hillman, Diane Robinson, Sugar Tiffany Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lambright v. Martinez et al
as 5:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lambright, Nathan Lambright and Nathaniel Paul Lambright
Defendant:
FNU Martinez, FNU Martinez 2, FNU Embry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacour v. Harris County et al
as 4:2023cv04280
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Lacour
Defendant:
Harris County, C. Chukwu and Nathan Reid Billingsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00235
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Tamez v. United States Of America
as 7:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lee Tamez
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
