Cases 1 - 10 of 683
Joel Spigelman v. Warden Rardin, et al
as 24-2495
Defendant:
Gabriel Langseth, Rehab Services, Warden Rardin, Peggy Moore, P.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Spigelman
Wakefield v. Scoble et al
as 3:2024cv02150
Defendant:
Dr. Ibraheim, Sue Mason, Megan Duiguid and others
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Wakefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamidulah Sarwary v. Peggy Llamas
as 2:2024cv07469
Respondent:
Peggy Llamas
Petitioner:
Hamidulah Sarwary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Stanton et al
as 2:2024cv00462
Defendant:
Eva D. Moore, Eric Aldridge, George M. Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gormley (PS) v. Khanzada et al
as 1:2024cv01534
Defendant:
Brittany Khanzada, Patrick Esse, Carlos Samour, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Gormley and Kathleen Mary Gormley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Tatum v. Brian Phillips
as 2:2024cv04562
Respondent:
Peggy Lamas
Petitioner:
Derrick Tatum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinones v. Rossignal, et al.
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Quinones
Defendant:
Peggy Rossignal and Salico Sean Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Stovall #601852 v. Bush et al
as 2:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Larry Stovall #601852
Defendant:
Jeremy Bush, Peggy Erickson, Unknown Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharpstene v. Bar-Larock et al
as 9:2023cv01308
Plaintiff:
Dylan Rhode Sharpstene
Defendant:
Brandi Bar-Larock, Peggy Harper, Sean O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
