Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Richards v. Wallace et al
as 2:2024cv01529
Plaintiff:
Eddie Richards
Defendant:
Reed Wallace, Travis Day, Medical Director Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Gardner, et al
as 2:2024cv01788
Defendant:
Scott Gardner, Melissa Thompson, Chris Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Virgil L Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couvillion v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Reed Couvillion
Defendant:
Joseph Lopinto, III and L. Preatto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Dauzat
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Reed
Defendant:
Michele Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Reed v. Terrebonne Parish Criminal Justice Complex
as 2:2023cv06488
Plaintiff:
Rodney Charles Reed
Defendant:
Terrebonne Parish Criminal Justice Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson et al v. Louisiana Board of Pardons et al
as 3:2023cv01494
Plaintiff:
Allen Robertson, Jr, Anthony Bell, Daniel Joseph Blank and others
Petitioner:
Jason Reeves
Defendant:
Gregory C Brown, Lederrick Campbell, Louisiana Board of Pardons and others
Not Classified By Court:
Shawn Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. USA
as 3:2023cv00523
Petitioner:
Quinn P. Reed
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Reed v. USA
as 3:2023cv00496
Petitioner:
Quinn P. Reed
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Reed v. Terrebonne Parish Sheriff Narcotics
as 2:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Rodney Charles Reed
Defendant:
Terrebonne Parish Sheriff Narcotics
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Goodwin
as 5:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Reed
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
