Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Starks v. Gwinnett County
as 1:2023cv02166
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Starks
Defendant:
Gwinnett County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks v. Gwinnett County Jail
as 1:2023cv02165
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Starks
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Jail, Keybo Taylor and Chief Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks v. Gwinnett County Sheriffs Office
as 1:2023cv02168
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Starks
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Sheriffs Office, Gwinnett County Jail, Keybo Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks v. Conner et al
as 1:2023cv02081
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Starks
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Superior Courts, Judge Melody Conner, Chief Legislator of Gwinnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STARKS v. WHITE et al
as 3:2022cv00058
Petitioner:
JOSEPH DONNELL STARKS
Respondent:
D PARKS WHITE, HARVEY WASSERMAN, EARNEST MONTGOMERY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welborn v. Ledbetter et al
as 1:2021cv04152
Plaintiff:
JASON WELBORN
Defendant:
James G Ledbetter, MARY DENHAM, DR EDWARD STARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELBORN v. LEDBETTER et al
as 5:2021cv00338
Plaintiff:
JASON WELBORN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER JAMES G LEDBETTER, MARY DENHAM, DR EDWARD STARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Almand et al
as 1:2020cv02772
Defendant:
Diane M. Stark, Victoria A. Schuster, Cobb County, Georgia and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Holmes et al
as 1:2020cv01232
Defendant:
Diane M. Stark, Amelia G. Pray, Kathleen Sherwood and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starks v. United States
as 1:2019cv04272
Petitioner:
David Starks
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
