Cases 1 - 10 of 9,136
King v. Sage
as 1:2024cv01628
Petitioner:
James Edwin King
Respondent:
Jessica Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rashon v. Rigney et al
as 3:2024cv00431
Defendant:
Rigney, Nerger, Pickens and others
Plaintiff:
King K Rashon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. King
as 1:2024cv05850
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Marie Ruiz
Defendant:
Captain King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #267009 v. King et al
as 1:2024cv00987
Respondent:
Chris King, Unknown Kaminiski, Security Classification Committee-LRF and others
Petitioner:
RESTRICTED FILER Derrick Lee Smith #267009
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gladden v. Johnson et al
as 5:2024ct03226
Defendant:
Ms. Henderson, Harley Johnson, David Bohanon and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone D. Gladden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. RMSC Deputy Warden et al
as 1:2024cv07029
Defendant:
Security Officer Douglas, Security Dep., Security Officer Taboada and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell King v. U.S.P. Victorville
as 5:2024cv01978
Petitioner:
Darrell King
Respondent:
U.S.P. Victorville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Biggs v. King
as 0:2024cv03672
Petitioner:
Donald Courtney Biggs
Respondent:
King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KING v. LUCUS et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Defendant:
MELANIE DAVIS, DEAN CULLER, HODGIN CARRIE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKay #874159 v. Davis et al
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Devin McKay #874159
Defendant:
B. Smith, Trish L. Kubont, Unknown King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
