Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Young v. Aziz et al
as 8:2024cv02589
Defendant:
Malik Aziz, Tiffany Minor and Donnaka Rarner-Lewis
Plaintiff:
Christopher Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Doe v. Shoats et al
as 1:2024cv02263
Respondent:
Bobbie Jo Fockler, Tiffany Shoats, Anthony G. Brown and others
Petitioner:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyner v. The State of Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv01474
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ray Tyner
Defendant:
The State of Maryland, Larry Hogan, Wes Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Falkenstein v. Rahman et al
as 8:2018cv03715
Defendant:
Dr. Ashraf, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Bernice Swan and others
Plaintiff:
John W. Falkenstein
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lanahan v. Hogan et al
as 1:2018cv00833
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Sheri Passrell, Stelious Vantelas, Ame Albright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bright v. Wexford Health
as 1:2016cv02528
Plaintiff:
William Bright
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Robustiano Barrera, Kimberly Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Correro-Vasquez v. Shearin et al
as 1:2013cv00996
Plaintiff:
Juan Correro-Vasquez
Defendant:
Bobby D. Shearin , Randy Watson , Robin Woolford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. McMillian
as 1:2010cv02012
Plaintiff:
David Whitaker
Defendant:
Tiffany M. McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Correctional Medical Services Inc. et al
as 8:2007cv03060
Plaintiff:
Daniel Webster Hill
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc., Tricia Baker and Tiffany Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
