Cases 81 - 90 of 148
Danny Amador v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv00850
Plaintiff:
Danny Amador
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department
Ham v. Clarendon County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2014cv04324
Plaintiff:
Thomas Olin Ham
Defendant:
Clarendon County Sheriff's Office, R L Garrett, Jr and Clarendon County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Berry et al v. Fayette County Sheriff
as 5:2014cv00356
Plaintiff:
Van Berry and Joshua Bedson
Defendant:
Office of the Fayette County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Billioni v. Bryant et al
as 0:2014cv03060
Plaintiff:
Michael Billioni
Defendant:
Bruce Bryant, York County, York County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ruddell v. Flagler County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2014cv00873
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ruddell
Defendant:
Flagler County Sheriff's Office and James L. Manfre
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
REUBEN v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
as 3:2014cv00250
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL DUWAYNE REUBEN
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Eaton v. County of Lake, Lake County Indiana
as 2:2014cv00163
Plaintiff:
Mary Eaton , Juanita Leipert and Jaylynn Cox
Defendant:
County of Lake, Lake County Indiana and Lake County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis v. Morgan County Sheriff's Department et al (PLR2)
as 3:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
Sue Ann Ellis
Defendant:
Morgan County Sheriff's Department , Glen Freytag , Don Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
William Martinez v. Hernando County Sheriff's Offi
as 14-10427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM C. MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
HERNANDO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Burdette v. Panola County et al
as 3:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
Earl Burdette
Defendant:
Panola County and Panola County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
