Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ZERR v. HAVEN ANIMAL HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION et al
as 1:2022cv05243
Plaintiff:
REBECCA ZERR
Defendant:
HAVEN ANIMAL HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION, RUSSELL HOWE-SMITH, JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
PERSON et al v. CIGNA HEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv14613
Defendant:
CIGNA CORP., DR. DONGWOO CHANG, CIGNA HEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LORIE ANN PERSON and THORD E PERSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PALMISANO et al v. CROWDERGULF, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv09371
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PALMISANO , JAY HAJESKI , SEAN WALL and others
Defendant:
CROWDERGULF, LLC, BIL-JIM CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. , MAPLE LAKE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. DEMPSEY-BROWN et al
as 2:2017cv05084
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF RODNEY D BROWN, III
Defendant:
JOSEPHINE R DEMPSEY-BROWN , IBM 401(K) PLUS PLAN , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cross_claimant:
IBM 401(K) PLUS PLAN
Cross_defendant:
JOSEPHINE R DEMPSEY-BROWN
Counter_claimant:
IBM 401(K) PLUS PLAN
Counter_defendant:
ESTATE OF RODNEY D BROWN, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
SCHWARTZ v. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS et al
as 2:2017cv00656
Plaintiff:
LAUREN F. SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS , ASSOCIATED EMPLOYERS GROUP BENEFIT PLAN AND TRUST , JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DEBLASIO v. CENTRAL METALS, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv05282
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DEBLASIO
Defendant:
CENTRAL METALS, INC. , ROMA STEEL ERECTION, INC. , ABC CORPORATION #1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
WAYNE SURGICAL CENTER, L.L.C. v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv02173
Plaintiff:
WAYNE SURGICAL CENTER, L.L.C.
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-100
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
