Cases 91 - 100 of 127
Malik v. Unknown et al
as 5:2014cv03473
Plaintiff:
Habeeb Abdul Malik
Defendant:
Beverly A Woods, Brian Stirling, Bernard McKie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Kaloroumakis et al
as 1:2014cv01794
Plaintiff:
Abdul Malik Muhammad
Defendant:
George Kaloroumakis, Christina Tyler-Cauffman, Thomas V. Kimball, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Williams
as 14-1617
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Darryl Board, Idris Cox, Najimah Abdul Cox and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Craig Williams
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Savings Plan v. Little et al
as 1:2013cv06281
Defendant:
Christopher Jackson and Abdul Malik Little
Plaintiff:
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Savings Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Abdul-Malik et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv22586
Plaintiff:
Lynn R. Abdul-Malik and Tharwat Abdul-Malik
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abdul-Malik et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-22586
Plaintiff:
Lynn R. Abdul-Malik and Tharwat Abdul-Malik
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Little et al
as 1:2013cv01059
Defendant:
Christopher Jackson and Abdul Malik Little
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Muhammad v. May et al
as 5:2012cv00394
Plaintiff:
Abdul Malik Muhammad
Defendant:
Larry May, Gaylon Lay and Mark Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
