Cases 91 - 100 of 152
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Clark v. 3000 Cumberland Club Dr. LP et al
as 1:2021cv03182
Plaintiff:
Larry Clark, Sr
Defendant:
3000 Cumberland Club Dr. LP doing business as Halsten @ Vinings Mountain, Attorney Daivd R. Passino, BH Management Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv22285
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv22287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv22279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
BH Management v. Hassan
as 1:2021cv02258
Plaintiff:
BH Management
Defendant:
Ata Hassan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robert Emery, Jr. v. Michael Gower, et al
as 21-35283
Defendant / Appellee:
SAN JUANITA ROSALES, BHS Manager, TRCI, in their individual and official capacities, M. VENTURA, Statewide ADA Coordinator, ODOC, in their individual and official capacities, M. PERRY, Acting Assistant Superintendent Corrections, in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE EMERY, Jr.
Cynthia Hines King v. BH Management Services, LLC
as 21-10105
Defendant / Appellee:
BH MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CYNTHIA L. HINES KING
Coviello et al v. BHS Management Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv30198
Defendant:
BHS Management Services, Inc., John Does 1-20 and The Board of Directors of BHS Management Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byrne, Matthew W. Coviello and Victoria Halsted
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01386
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
