Cases 91 - 100 of 4,485
Marsh et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 1:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Cecil Dalbert Marsh and Allison Marsh
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Pilot Catastrophe Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Morton v. Bennett
as 24-3009
Petitioner:
CECIL L. MORTON
Respondent:
JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Cecil Quinn, Jr. v. Mark Hayes
as 24-6248
Plaintiff:
CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.
Defendant:
MARK J. HAYES, HOPE M. BLACKLEY, GAIL MOFFITT and others
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cecil Quinn, Jr. v. State of South Carolina Marshals
as 24-6249
Plaintiff:
CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA MARSHALS, 7th Judicial, Spartanburg, AGENT DILLION, 7th Judicial Parole Officer, WARDEN ROBERT MICHAEL, Stevenston, III and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CHARLES BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jones v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65349
Plaintiff:
Cecil Jones
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
