Cases 91 - 100 of 372
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Hill et al
as 8:2021cv00557
Defendant:
malcolm hill, innovative security concepts d/b/a Invictus cigars and Innovative Security Concepts doing business as Invictus Cigars
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Hill v. Warden
as 1:2021cv00444
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Louis Hill, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Weber et al
as 1:2021cv00353
Defendant:
Moore, Wuestneck, Thornton and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Young v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2021cv00206
Defendant:
O. Wayne Hill, Ofc. D. Arndt, Ronnie Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Mikel Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Wright v. IBM et al
as 1:2021cv00149
Defendant:
Aviation Inn, Isle of Verde Hampton Inn and Suites San Juan, Puerto Rico, Marriott Grande Vista Orlando, FL and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haughie v. U.S. et al
as 8:2021cv00101
Defendant:
W. Hill, Security Guard Patterson, B. Swan-Mace and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Haughie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mills v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv03767
Defendant:
Officer Dorcan, Robin Woolford, Lt. Sawyers and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hill et al v. Hunt et al
as 1:2020cv03746
Plaintiff:
Nichoel Hill and William Hill
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Human Services, Maryland Child Protective Services, Baltimore County Department of Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hill v. Maryland Parole Commission
as 1:2020cv03609
Defendant:
Maryland Parole Commission
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03507
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Nicole Hill
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
