Cases 91 - 100 of 181
Jorge Gonzalez Valdez v. Armstrong
as 5:2015cv01656
Defendant:
Armstrong
Plaintiff:
Jorge Gonzalez Valdez
Luna et al v. Benny's Burritos, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06479
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Luna, Miguel Luis Yat Chic, Sinuhe Flores Munoz and others
Defendant:
Benny's Burritos, Inc. doing business as Benny's Burritos, Blockhead's Burritos, Inc. doing business as Blockheads, Egg White, Inc. doing business as Blockheads and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jorge Gonzalez Orduno v. People of the State of California
as 4:2015cv03018
Petitioner:
Jorge Gonzalez Orduno
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GONZALEZ v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04609
Plaintiff:
JORGE GONZALEZ
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez-Zuleta v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2015cv00296
Petitioner:
Jorge Gonzalez-Zuleta
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez-Zuleta v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2015cv00277
Petitioner:
Jorge Gonzalez-Zuleta
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jorge Gonzalez Orduno v. People of the State of California
as 2:2015cv03009
Petitioner:
Jorge Gonzalez Orduno
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Gonzalez v. Karesh Glass, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03432
Plaintiff:
Jorge Gonzalez
Defendant:
Karesh Glass, LLC and Jorge Diaz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
RAMIREZ v. JORANJES ENTERPRISE INC. et al
as 1:2015cv20952
Plaintiff:
OSIEL S. RAMIREZ
Defendant:
JORANJES ENTERPRISE INC. , JESSI ENTERPRISES, INC. and JORGE GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
