Cases 91 - 100 of 141
Yates v. Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP
as 5:2014mc00001
Plaintiff:
Richard Yates
Defendant:
Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP
MYERS v. USA
as 1:2013cv01089
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JOHN FRANKLIN MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Red Wolf Coalition et al v. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission et al
as 2:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
Red Wolf Coalition , Defenders of Wildlife and Animal Welfare Institute
Defendant:
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission , Jim Cogdell , John Litton Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
MYERS v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00898
Plaintiff:
VICKIE L. MYERS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MYERS v. USA
as 1:2013cv00860
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JOHN FRANKLIN MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Evans, et al v. PMT Express, LLC, et al
as 4:2013cv00210
Plaintiff:
Bessie Evans and S.H.
Defendant:
PMT Express, LLC , Paul Miller Trucking, Inc. and James Philip Myers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
FLOWERS v. MYERS et al
as 1:2013cv00560
Plaintiff:
RODNEY DEMETRIUS FLOWERS
Defendant:
B. J. MYERS, MARTY SUMNER and HIGH POINT POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fail et al v. Motiva Enterprises LLC et al
as 5:2013cv00391
Plaintiff:
Harold Ray Fail and Dorothy Fail Myers
Defendant:
Motiva Enterprises LLC , Shell Oil Company and Saudi Refining, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
MYERS v. USA
as 1:2013cv00290
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL RYAN MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Myers v. Nealey
as 5:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
Sir Richard Myers
Defendant:
Gary Wayne Nealey and Dumas Motor Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
