Cases 91 - 100 of 107
OBIEGBU v. MR. FINLEY et al
as 3:2010cv00301
Petitioner:
JOHNSON OBIEGBU
Respondent:
MR. FINLEY and MR. C. ROTHERMEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baltasaras v. Middle Brooks et al
as 1:2010cv23770
Plaintiff:
Romilus Baltasaras
Defendant:
Scott Middle Brooks, Ms. Mary, Mr. Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillon v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-1425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INGMAR GILLON
Defendant - Appellee:
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN BLAKE DAVIS, US PENITENTIARY FLORENCE COLORADO and others
Hinojosa v. Thaler et al
as 6:2010cv00248
Respondent:
Grievance Coordinator, Sgt. FNU Haynes, Ms. C. Herod and others
Petitioner:
Miguel Hinojosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Keen Mountain Correctional Center et al
as 7:2010cv00393
Defendant:
Mrs. Ball, M. Boyd, Lt. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Humphrey et al
as 5:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris
Defendant:
Carl Humphrey, Doug Underwood, Danny Piland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Aaron Brooks v. John Does
as 5:2010cv00423
Defendant:
Mr. Allen, Mr. Almond, Ms. Avalo and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Aaron Brooks
Neal v. Crawford et al
as 3:2009cv00157
Plaintiff:
David R Neal
Defendant:
Dr Crawford, Mrs C Mongomery, Regional Dir Altoamos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Ellis v. Elder
as 09-6344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELDER, Officer, BOOKER, Mr.; Assistant Warden, HARPER, Mr.; Sgt. Institution Investigator and others
Alan Nakamura v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 8:2009cv00132
Plaintiff:
Alan Nakamura
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, Baca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
