Cases 91 - 100 of 102
Joseph Wheeler v. Fayette SCI, et al
as 09-3034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH E. WHEELER
Defendant - Appellee:
FAYETTE SCI, PA Department of Corrections and SHAWN NOSE, Lt., Individually and in his capacity as an Officer with PA Department of Corrections, SCI-Fayette
Johnnie Smith v. Brian Coleman
as 09-2695
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNIE LEE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN COLEMAN, Superintendent, SCI-Fayette
MORRIS v. SCHOMPERT et al
as 2:2009cv00694
Plaintiff:
TREVAR MORRIS
Defendant:
SCHOMPERT, THOMAS, HALFHILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Hickman v. Brian Coleman, et al
as 09-2464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY HICKMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN COLEMAN, Superintendent, SCI-Fayette and COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
HULL v. LEGGET et al
as 2:2009cv00610
Plaintiff:
DONALD R. HULL
Defendant:
LEGGET, TREMPUS, SCI-FAYETTE'S SECURITY TEAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2009cv01149
Petitioner:
BOBBY JACOB WRIGHT, SR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI FAYETTE and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wright v. Superintendent of SCI Fayette
as 3:2009cv00407
Petitioner:
Bobby Jacob Wright, Sr.
Respondent:
Superintendent of SCI Fayette and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
v. BURNAM et al
as 2:2009cv00115
Petitioner:
JEROME BURNAM
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI-FAYETTE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MARTIN v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET. AL. et al
as 2:2008cv01604
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. MARTIN, JR.
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET. AL. and STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION SCI FAYETTE ET. AL.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dennis McKeithan v. Gary Abram
as 08-1746
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS MCKEITHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY ABRAMS, JEFFREY BEARD, SHARON BURKE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
