Cases 91 - 99 of 99
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv01733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv01732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
DENEFIELD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv00188
Plaintiff:
JESSICA DENEFIELD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES, COLLEGE OF MEDICINE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC et al v. WHITMIRE MICRO-GEN RESEARCH LABORATORIES INC
as 1:2007mc00015
Plaintiff:
DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC and UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
Defendant:
WHITMIRE MICRO-GEN RESEARCH LABORATORIES INC
BETA UPSILON CHI UPSILON CHAPTER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA v. MACHEN et al
as 1:2007cv00135
Plaintiff:
BETA UPSILON CHI UPSILON CHAPTER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, BETA UPSILON CHI UPSILON CHAPTER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA and BETA UPSILON CHI INC
Defendant:
J BERNARD MACHEN, PATRICIA TELLES-IRVIN, EDDIE DANIELS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KENNELLEY v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
as 1:2007cv00128
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH KENNELLEY
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
