Cases 91 - 100 of 116
In GLAXOSMITHKLINE ERISA LITIG
as 11-2289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles J. Gum, on Behalf of Himself and a Class of Persons Similarly Situated and Marilyn S. Hayes
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Does, 1-30
Defendant - Appellee:
Glaxosmithkline Retirement Savings Plan Committee, Andrew Witty, Jean-Pierre Garnier and others
Miller v. Shinseki et al
as 1:2011cv21854
Plaintiff:
Samuel Obediah Miller
Defendant:
Eric Ken Shinseki, R.F. Bowron, Kerrie L. Witty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Belton, Sr. v. USA, et al
as 11-5105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry E. Belton, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Michelle Kwok, Gary Hart and others
Witty v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2011cv00662
Plaintiff:
Elaine Witty
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BELTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv00102
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. BELTON, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHELLE KWOK, GARY HART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witty v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
Yvon Witty
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation and Eckerd Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hayes v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC et al
as 1:2010cv07275
Plaintiff:
Marilyn S. Hayes
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Glaxosmithkline Retirement Savings Plan Committee, Andrew Witty and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Heizelman v. Belo Corp. et al
as 3:2010cv01982
Plaintiff:
Robert Heizelman
Defendant:
Belo Corp., ABC News, Channel 6 and 7 News in Boise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hiezelman v. GSK et al
as 3:2010cv02035
Plaintiff:
Robert Hiezelman
Defendant:
GSK, Andrew Witty, Julian Heslop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
