Cases 101 - 110 of 718
MATTHEWS v. USA
as 1:2022cv00938
Petitioner:
JUSTIN GUNSIAN MATTHEWS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BRIM v. USA
as 1:2022cv00924
Petitioner:
PAUL MATTHEW BRIM
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Lett et al
as 5:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Carl Deion Johnson
Defendant:
Matthew Lett, FNU Benjamin and Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hundley v. White et al
as 5:2022ct03388
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ray Hundley
Defendant:
Keno White, Gavin Lowry and Sgt. Steven Tubbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sapp v. Pennington et al
as 3:2022cv00563
Plaintiff:
Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant:
Clark A. Pennington, Matthews Police Department, Danielle R. Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGriff El v. Bland et al
as 5:2022ct03377
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lee McGriff El
Defendant:
Judge William Bland, D.A. Matthew L. Delbrige and Larry Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prevette v. Gaither et al
as 5:2022ct03367
Plaintiff:
Brandon Matthew Prevette
Defendant:
Dr. Lisa Gaither, Dental Assistant Blany, Nurse Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sapp v. Matthews Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant:
Matthews Police Department, Clark A. Pennington, Danielle R. Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sapp v. Matthews Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant:
Matthews Police Department, Clark A. Pennington, Danielle R. Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sapp v. Matthews Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00525
Plaintiff:
Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant:
Matthews Police Department, Clark A. Pennington, Danielle R. Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
